|
Home vs. In-Center Dialysis: Reassessing the Burdens
Dori Schatell
The
new Medicare draft Conditions for Coverage propose to require that
patients be told about all treatment options — a positive change. But
how and what we tell patients influences their perceptions, decisions,
and even their prejudices about each modality. Since, for a variety of
reasons — both medical and lifestyle-related — many patients will
change from one modality to another over time, it is vital that we give
accurate and balanced messages about what day-to-day life on dialysis
may be like. So, let’s take a fresh look at the burdens of home and
in-center dialysis on patients and families and challenge some of our
own assumptions.
“Leave the Driving to Us”
There
is a belief in dialysis that in-center hemodialysis poses the least
burden to patients and their families. But is this really the case?
Yes, the treatments are administered by the care team. However,
in-center hemodialysis creates arguably the highest burden of any
modality in terms of life disruption, emotional upsets, and the need to
adhere closely to a variety of difficult lifestyle changes. For example:
- Patients’
family, work, and community roles are disrupted by the need to travel
to and from a dialysis clinic — on the clinic’s schedule — three times
each week. Transportation alone can become hugely burdensome on family
members, even forcing some to give up their jobs. It is very difficult
for working-age patients to keep their own jobs if they must dialyze
during work hours. Family life is further disrupted by the physical
ups-and-downs of intermittent short dialysis treatments (e.g.,
“dialysis hangover,” cramping, fatigue), and by more frequent access
problems and related hospitalizations than typically occur at home with
a consistent cannulator on hemodialysis, or with peritoneal dialysis
(PD).
- Emotionally,
patients on in-center hemodialysis are constantly faced with the need
to interact with staff and other patients for hours on end — and
interpersonal skills are not everyone’s strongest suit: conflict is
both ubiquitous and stressful. Too, patients on in-center dialysis are
constantly faced with the loss of their own self-efficacy, and also
with the tangible loss of other patients, even to the point of
witnessing deaths in the clinic. Finally, the inability to fulfill
family, work, and community roles can contribute to depression. Family
members, too, must cope with patients’ upsets.
- “Compliance,”
“adherence,” or what the Medical Education Institute prefers to call
“following the treatment plan” is extremely challenging with in-center
hemodialysis, which requires the lowest limits on fluids, the greatest
number of medications, and a diet that must somehow balance increased
protein intake with reduced amounts of phosphorus, sodium, and
potassium. The daily struggle merely to figure out what’s okay to eat
and to avoid favorite foods that are now “off-limits” is one that most
of us have struggled with at some point just to lose weight. And how
successful have we been at that?
All
in all, the reality is that patients on in-center hemodialysis and
their families are doing plenty of the driving themselves — they’re
just not getting credit for it.
Burdens of Home Dialysis
Any
form of home dialysis requires a training period ranging from a week or
two for PD, 2 to 3 weeks for home hemodialysis using the NxStage
machine, to as many as 4 to 6 weeks for other home hemodialysis.
Training may interfere with work, and may be inconveniently located,
perhaps requiring a hotel stay. Essentially, patients and families must
learn what dialysis technicians learn.
Once
home, patients and families may need to inventory, order, store, and
rotate supplies; set up a machine; conduct and monitor all of
treatments, fitting them into family life; troubleshoot machine and
treatment problems; report problems or symptoms; keep records; and
attend monthly clinic visits. The presence of equipment and supplies in
the home serve as a constant reminder of the treatment — there is no
forgetting it at the clinic and keeping the home separate.
Further, patients on home dialysis and their families must agree to
take on the stressful and frightening role of recognizing and dealing
with emergencies. Needles come untaped. Machines break down. Cycler
patients retain fluid instead of removing it. Heart attacks occur.
Being prepared for anything at any time is a role not every patient and
family member is willing to assume.
Summary
The
decline in home dialysis didn’t happen overnight, and there is no
question that it will take time to reverse it. But the renal community
has never before had a unified voice to speak on behalf of home
therapies—and it is this voice that the MEI is trying to build through
Home Dialysis Central. With your help, we can work together to create
the kind of sea change that will allow us to empower both ourselves and
our patients.
Separate but Equal
Taken
together, it is clear that dialysis of any sort creates significant
burdens on patients and their families in terms of time commitment,
lifestyle accommodations, emotional adjustments, and following the
treatment plan. But rather than assuming that one set of burdens is
less than the other; isn’t it really more fair to say that they’re
different? If so, we owe it to patients to present the options in all
their complexity and allow them to choose a treatment that best suits
their lifestyle and ability to be involved in their care.
For
resources, tips, patient stories, clinics, and more on all types of
Home Dialysis, visit Home Dialysis Central at www.homedialysis.org.
| Readers
are invited to contribute opinion essays for the Professional Issues
department. Articles should cover topics of current interest to
nephrology nurses. The Nephrology Nursing Journal encourages candid
opinions. For specific guidelines, contact Paula Dutka,
Department Editor, through the ANNA National Office; East Holly
Avenue/Box 56; Pitman, NJ 08071-0056. You may also log onto this column
at www.nephrologynursingjournal.net (click on Department link) and
email your comments to the Department Editor (see Discussion Area). The
opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American
Nephrology Nurses’ Association. |
|