|
Dialyzing Children in the Adult World
Angel Krueger, RN, CNN, is
a Renal Outpatient Clinic Nurse, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston,
TX. She is a member of ANNA’s Pediatric Special Interest Group and of
the Gulf Coast Chapter.
Amelia Allsteadt, BSN, RN, CNN, is
a Nurse Educator, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX. She is a
member of ANNA’s Pediatric Special Interest Group and of the Gulf Coast
Chapter.
Due to increasing numbers of children requiring maintenance
hemodialysis, lack of pediatric nephrologists and distance from
pediatric dialysis facilities, some children are receiving dialysis
therapy in adult programs. According to the United States Renal Data
System (USRDS, 2007), there were 7,288 children with chronic kidney
disease (CKD) Stage 5 in 2005. Of those, 1292 were on hemodialysis, 892
on peritoneal dialysis, and 5104 were transplanted. Currently, in the
U.S., there are 354 adult and pediatric dialysis units providing
incenter hemodialysis to pediatric patients.
We currently provide maintenance dialysis to 68 patients at Texas
Children’s Hospital in Houston, Texas. Thirty-three children receive
hemodialysis and 35 children receive peritoneal dialysis. While our
center cares for children from as far away as 541 miles, many patients
cannot be cared for effectively at great distances due to family
constraints. In the event that a family does not have the resources for
long, frequent commutes or relocation, these children must be followed
in an adult program. This article is focused at assisting nurses in
adult facilities with the care required for a child or adolescent
receiving hemodialysis. Included are some of the fundamental
differences encountered when providing care to children.
Assessment
The pre/post-treatment assessment of a child or adolescent resembles
that of the adult with some modifications. Details on comprehensive
physical assessment for children with CKD are available in the ANNA
Core Curriculum for Nephrology Nurses (Currier, McCarley, & Brewer,
2001; McAfee, Richards & Smith, 2008). Pre/posttreatment weight is
supervised by staff at the scale to ensure accurate measurement. Height
is measured at least quarterly and plotted on a growth chart.
Temperature is taken pre/posttreatment and during treatment if an
infection is suspected. Children weighing less than 20 kg are placed on
an electrocardiogram (EKG) monitor prior to initiation of hemodialysis
treatment. Ranges for heart and respiratory rates are shown in Table 1.
Blood pressures (BP) should be measured with an appropriately sized
cuff. The cuff bladder should cover 80%-100% of the arm circumference
and length should cover approximately two-thirds of the upper arm.
Pediatric blood pressure standards based on gender and height can be
found at:
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/child_tbl.pdf
(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [NHLBI], 2004).
The dialysis facility should ensure that children are current on their
childhood immunizations. These immunizations are in addition to the
dialysis specific hepatitis B and pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza
vaccines. A complete vaccination schedule can be found at http://
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/default.htm (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention [CDC], 2007).
Target Dry Weight
Assessment
of target dry weight in pediatric patients on hemodialysis is
difficult. Small fluid shifts may result in symptoms associated with
ultrafiltration, such as cramping and nausea, but children may not
verbalize complaints. Achieving dry weight is critical since chronic
fluid overload can result in hypertension and left ventricular
hypertrophy (Jain, Smith, Brewer, & Goldstein, 2001).
Accurate determination involves clinical assessment as well as the use
of new technologies. Assessment should include: pre/postreplacement
treatment weight, pre/intradialytic/post BP measurements as well as
noninvasive volumetric measurements (NIVM), and bioimpedance.
NIVM measures hematocrit, blood volume change, and oxygen saturation
during each hemodialysis treatment. These values allow the clinician to
observe real time intravascular volume changes and proactively
intervene during the treatment. (HemaMetrics, 2004). Bioimpedance can
also be useful in determining body hydration in patients requiring
hemodialysis. (Schneditz 2006). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
measures the resistance met by the flow of a low electrical current as
it passed through the body. Fluid in lean tissue contains intracellular
fluid and electrolytes and will have low impedance. In contrast,
impedance is high in fat tissue; thus, impedance is proportional to
total body water (TBW). (Biodynamics Corporation, 2007).
In our patient population, bioimpedance is performed by our renal
dietician at least monthly and more often in those children with
difficult to manage BP and fluid volumes. It is our practice to
reassess dry weight on a monthly basis or in the event of any change in
health status such as recent hospitalization.
Dialysis Prescription
The
selection of a dialyzer and appropriate bloodlines is dependent on the
size of the child. A safe extra-corporeal volume (ECV) should be less
than 10% of the child’s estimated blood volume (EBV). The EBV for a
child or adolescent is determined by multiplying 70 mL times the
child’s dry weight in kg. The formula for ECV% is (Currier et al.,
2001):
ECV% = Dialyzer volume + blood line volume
_____________________________
EBV
Blood pump flow rates can be maximized to 400 mL/min/1.73 m2. Dialysate
flow should be set at 1fi times the ordered blood pump flow to maximize
clearance.
A dialysis treatment in our facility is complete when the liters
processed have met the original goal as outlined in the renal
replacement therapy (RRT) prescription. This prevents inadequate RRT in
the event of poor access flows or excessive machine alarms. In order to
determine needed liters processed, the ordered blood flow is multiplied
by the treatment hours in minutes and divided by 1000. For example: QB
(400 ml) x 3 hour (180 min)/1000 = 72 liters processed. The liters
processed goal can be programmed into the treatment parameters on some
dialysis machines.
Ultrafiltration
NIVM during hemodialysis for ultrafiltration (UF) is especially useful
in children. A study by Jain and colleagues (2001) concluded that
NIVM with blood volume change less than 8% is safe in the first hour of
RRT. The study also showed that blood volume change less than 4% in
each subsequent hour of dialysis reduces ultrafiltration-associated
symptoms in children. Further studies from Patel and colleagues (2007)
demonstrated the effectiveness of targeting 50% of total UF in the
first hour of treatment guided by a maximum blood volume change of
8%-12%. The remaining 50% of UF is the goal for the remainder of the
treatment with a blood volume change less than 5% per hour. This can
lead to better BP control and decreased need for anti-hypertensive
medications. Our staff utilizes these guidelines to optimize fluid
removal and assessment of overall fluid status. Children who are
nonadherent to fluid restriction may require an additional 30 minutes
of sequential ultrafiltration at the beginning of the treatment for
fluid weight gain greater than 10% above dry weight. In some cases, an
additional treatment during the week may be necessary.
Anticoagulation
Heparin dosing is based on activated clotting time (ACT) profiling and
can be adjusted to achieve ACTs in the prescribed range as follows:
tight or controlled anticoagulation ACT range - 120 to 160 seconds and
regular systemic anticoagulation ACT range - 180 to 220 seconds
(Daschner & Schaefer, 2004).
Children/adolescents with fistulas or grafts receive 50 units/kg of
heparin at initiation of hemodialysis. They also receive 25 units of
heparin/kg during each subsequent hour. The heparin infusion is
terminated 30 minutes prior to completion of treatment in patients with
an arteriovenous fistula/arteriovenous graft (AVF/AVG) in order to
minimize posttreatment bleeding from the venipuncture sites. Children
with indwelling catheters receive heparin infusion until RRT is
complete to maintain patency of the indwelling catheter.
Vascular Access
A fistula or graft is the ideal vascular access for children greater
than 20 kg on hemodialysis. Those children expecting to wait more than
1 year for renal transplantation should also be considered for fistula
or graft placement. In children less than 20 kg, a central venous
catheter (CVC) placed in the internal jugular vein is acceptable for
long-term vascular access. Other considerations in choosing a CVC
rather than a fistula or graft include lack of surgical expertise,
child size unable to support vascular access, and bridging from one
modality to another (National Kidney Foundation [NKF], 2006).
The goal of vascular access is to deliver blood pump flow rates through
the extracorporeal circuit at a range of 3 to 5 mL/kg/min to achieve
desired urea clearance. To ensure adequate blood pump flow rates,
vascular accesses should be monitored monthly for stenosis and other
complications. At our facility, we have identified a staff member as an
access coordinator. This individual monitors AV fistulas and grafts
with ultrasound dilution (UD) monthly, and documents findings. Numerous
studies from our center show that UD is a dependable method for
monitoring access flow and detecting venous stenosis. Patients with
access flow of less than 650 ml/min/1.73m2 and more than 50% luminal
stenosis should be referred for venography and angioplasty within 48
hours (NKF, 2006).
Cannulation
It is helpful to designate a core group of experienced staff members
for initial cannulation of newly formed fistulas and grafts. If using
the buttonhole technique, the same staff member should cannulate the
fistula until the buttonhole is established. Our center has been very
successful in training children/adolescents to perform self-cannulation
with the buttonhole technique. This technique fosters independence and
decreases pain associated with cannulation. Guidelines, tools used in
creating and working with buttonholes, and patient information on
buttonholes can be found at
www.fistulafirst.org/professionals/literature.php (Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, 2007).
Pain Management
Our goal for pain management is to strive for atraumatic care. This
involves minimizing physical stressors that are encountered in the
dialysis facility. Utilizing topical or subcutaneous anesthetic for
cannulation, buttonhole technique, distraction or play therapy, and
minimizing child/parental separation support the goals of atraumatic
care.
Staffing Ratios
Staff to patient ratio is dependent on child size, acuity, and state
requirements. In our facility, children weighing less than 10 kg are
cared for at a 1:1 ratio. Children weighing 10-20 kg are 1:2, and those
weighing more than 20 kg and who are stable can be 1:3. Facilities
utilizing patient care technicians (PCTs), should refer to
state-specific ESRD facilities licensing regulations. In certain
states, PCTs are prohibited from providing hemodialysis treatment to
pediatric patients under 14 years of age or under 35 kilograms.
Otherwise pediatric patients can be cared for by PCTs under the
supervision of a registered nurse. (Texas Department of State Health
Services, 2004).
Nutrition
Children receiving dialysis are at risk for protein-energy malnutrition
(PEM). In order to support adequate growth, protein and caloric intake
should be optimized. Our dieticians and nephrologists monitor the
normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) as well as serum albumin
levels to assess nutritional status. Children with nPCR less than 1
g/kg/d may be at risk for weight loss. Those children with poor
nutritional status may require oral supplementation such as Nepro®
or Suplena®. When oral supplementation is inadequate, the
nasogastric or gastrostomy button (GB) route may be necessary. In
severe cases of PEM (patients less than 90% of ideal body weight),
intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) may be warranted (Goldstein,
Baronette, Gambrell, Currier, & Brewer, 2002).
Although nutritional status is a concern, we have found that children
in our facility tolerate hemodialysis better if they avoid eating or
drinking during their treatments. Daily dietary recommendations based
on age and dialysis modality are found in Table 2.
Growth and Development
Growth failure is a significant complication experienced by children
with CKD. The correction of malnutrition, acidosis, anemia, and bone
disease in conjunction with growth hormone therapy can increase height
for children with CKD. Data from the USRDS (2007) shows that 65% of
children with CKD Stage 5 have a growth rate in the lowest one-fifth of
the general population.
Growth hormone (GH) therapy should be considered when a child’s height
plateaus or for children who are at less than the third percentile of
height for age. Prior to initiation of growth hormone therapy, thyroid
function tests, wrist bone age, and hip x-rays are necessary. Children
with rickets or slipped capital femoral epiphysis should not begin GH
therapy until these problems have been resolved. Height should be
measured at least quarterly and documented on a standardized growth
chart (NKF, 2004). For those children who are nonadherent to GH
therapy, the dose can be adjusted and administered at the dialysis
facility.
It is important to remember that children with CKD also experience a
delay in pubertal development. Bi-annual physical assessment should
include Tanner staging. The Tanner stages for both males and females
are described in Table 3.
Child Life Specialists
Child life specialists can provide much needed support to
children/adolescents in the dialysis setting. These trained
professionals use age-appropriate play and distraction techniques to
assist children through uncomfortable procedures. In the event that a
child life specialist is not available in your facility, you can
collaborate with a child life specialist at another facility for
support.
Psychosocial
Children and adolescents with kidney disease have unique emotional and
social needs. It is important for caregivers to assist children and
families to cope with CKD. Social development and self-esteem are
closely tied to relationships with peers; therefore, those
relationships should be encouraged. In an effort to facilitate
socialization, children in our facility have many opportunities to meet
and interact outside of the dialysis setting. They may choose to attend
summer camp, museum outings, professional sports engagements, and teen
lock-ins. In adult facilities caring for more than one child/adolescent
patient, social activities should be introduced. Collaboration with the
nearest pediatric center may provide opportunities such as summer camp
for child/adolescent patients on dialysis.
School
Children receiving dialysis experience many interruptions during the
school year due to dialysis treatments, hospital admissions, and
illness. Children should be encouraged to continue attending school as
much as possible in order not to fall behind their peers. It is often
necessary to adjust dialysis schedules to allow them to attend as much
of the school day as possible. In our facility, the first hour of
dialysis is dedicated to homework. Children are encouraged not to watch
television or play video games during this time.
Other Considerations
Any facility caring for a child/adolescent must have the resources and
equipment to meet the safety needs of this population. The emergency
cart in your facility should be equipped with pediatric-specific
equipment. All medication doses are based on a child’s weight. Dosages
for emergency medications should be calculated and documented in the
child’s chart. This eliminates need for calculations during an
emergency situation. These doses should be updated with any significant
weight change.
Conclusion
When a child or adolescent arrives in an adult facility, both the
patient and the caregivers may experience anxiety. It may be helpful to
identify staff members who enjoy caring for a younger population and
partnering with a pediatric facility for support and collaboration. The
ANNA Pediatric Special Interest Group is another available resource for
education and support.
By sharing our knowledge and work experience with those suddenly faced
with providing care for this unique population, we as pediatric
nephrology nurses hope to assuage some of the anxiety while providing
support and education to ultimately improve care.
References American
Nephrology Nurses’ Association (ANNA). (2007). ANNA pediatric stage 5
chronic kidney disease module. Pitman, NJ: Author.
Biodynamics Corporation. (2007). Clinician desk reference for BIA
testing. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved January 7, 2008, from
http://www.biodyncorp.com/pdf/clinician_desk_reference_bio.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007). Vaccines and
immunizations. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/ schedules/default.htm
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2007). Fistula First
National Vascular Access Improvement Initiative. Retrieved on December
29, 2007, from www.fistulafirst.com
Child Growth Foundation. (2008). Puberty and Tanner stages. Retrieved
January 3, 2008, from
http://www.childgrowthfoundation.org/psm_tanner_stages.htm
Currier, H., McCarley, P.B., & Brewer, E.D. (2001). The pediatric
renal failure-dialysis-transplant patient. In L.E. Lancaster (Ed.),
ANNA core curriculum for nephrology nurses (pp. 377-416). Pitman, NJ:
American Nephrology Nurses’ Association.
Daschner, M., Schaefer, F.S., (2004). Technical aspects of the
hemodialysis procedure. In B. Warady, F.S. Schaefer, R.N. Fine, &
S.R. Alexander (Eds.), Pediatric dialysis (pp. 94-96). Norwell, CT:
Klumer.
Goldstein, S.L, Baronette, S., Gambrell, T., Currier, H., & Brewer,
E.D. (2002). nPCR assessment and IDPN treatment of malnutrition in
pediatric hemodialysis patients. Pediatric Nephrology, 17(7), 531-534.
HemaMetrics. (2004). User’s manual. Kaysville, UT: Author. Retrieved
January 7, 2008, from
http://www.hemametrics.com/UserManuals.jsp?from=OnlineLibrary
Jain, S.R., Smith, L., Brewer, E.D., & Goldstein, S.L. (2001).
Non-invasive intravascular monitoring in the pediatric hemodialysis
population. Pediatric Nephrology, 16(1), 15-18.
McAfee, N., Richards, C., & Smith, J. (2008). Care of the infant
through adolescent with chronic kidney disease. In C.S. Counts (Ed.),
ANNA core curriculum for nephrology nurses (5th ed.) (pp. 883-928).
Pitman, NJ: American Nephrology Nurses’ Association.
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). (2004). Blood pressure
tables for children and adolescents. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved on
January 3, 2008, from
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/child_tbl.pdf
National Kidney Foundation (NKF). (2006). K/DOQI clinical practice
recommendation 8: Vascular access in pediatric patients. New York:
Author. Retrieved December 29, 2007, from
www.kidney.org/professionals/Kdoqi/guideline_upHD_PD_VA/va_rec8.htm
National Kidney Foundation (NKF). (2004). K/DOQI clinical practice
guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in children with chronic
kidney disease. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 46, S1-121.
New York State Department of Health. (2007). Pediatric assessment.
Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://www.
health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/ems/pdf/pediatric_
assessment_reference_card.pdf
Patel, H.P., Goldstein, S.L., Mahan, J.D., Smith, B., Fried, C.B.,
Currier, H., et al., (2007). A standard, noninvasive monitoring of
hematocrit algorithm improves blood pressure control in pediatric
hemodialysis patients. Clinical Journal of American Society of
Nephrology, 2(2), 252-257.
Schneditz, D. (2006). The arrow of bioimpedance. Kidney International, 69, 1492–1493.
Texas Department of State Health Services. (2004). Position statement
regarding minimum staffing in end stage renal disease facilities.
Dallas, TX: Author. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from
http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/hfp/PDF/ESRD%20
PositionStatement_Staffing.pdf
United States Renal Data Systems (USRDS). (2007). Annual data report.
Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from www.usrds.org
| The Practice Issues in Nephrology Nursing department
focuses on issues identified by ANNA's Special Interest Groups. Address
correspondence to: Karen Robbins, Associate Editor, through the
Nephrology Nursing Journal; East Holly Avenue/Box 56; Pitman NJ
08071-0056; (856) 256-2320, or by emailing her at kcr_nnj@yahoo.com.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of
the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
American Nephrology Nurses' Association. |
|