Determining Maturity of New Arteriovenous Fistulae
Lynda Ball
Q:
Our facility is seeing an increase in arteriovenous (AV) fistulae. Is
there a way to know when AV fistulae are mature enough to cannulate?
A: While
access maturity has more to do with the patient’s co-morbid conditions,
the surgeon’s evaluation process, and the surgical technique for access
creation, nurses can develop physical assessment skills that will
enable them to determine whether the access is maturing and able to be
cannulated. Robbin and colleagues (2003) found that 80% of the time
experienced dialysis nurses can accurately identify when an AV fistula
is mature enough to cannulate.
Arterialization,
the process of vein wall thickening and increasing vein diameter, is
dependent on the pressure of the arterial inflow and resistance in the
vein (Beathard, 1998). Wong et al. (1996) determined that maturation of
an AV fistula typically occurs within the first 2 weeks after creation.
This is why it is so important to begin evaluation of a new AV fistula
immediately after the patient returns to the dialysis facility.
Palpation
is the key assessment process to determine access development. The
thrill should feel like a vibration or purring that is soft and easy to
compress. While staff members often think that a strong pulsation is a
sign of a well-functioning fistula, the exact opposite is true – it
usually suggests that there is a stenosis present, and the soft easy
pulse is replaced with a firmer “water hammer” pulse. Dr. Beathard, an
expert in physical assessment of AV fistulae, states that the stronger
the vibration/purring of the thrill, the more likely there will be good
access arterialization (Beathard et al., 2003).
With
a lightly applied tourniquet to the axilla area of the upper arm,
document the baseline width of the fistula by either taking a photo,
marking the fistula margins with an indelible pen or by measuring the
width with a tape measure. If the access is arterializing
appropriately, there will be a noticeable increase of the size of the
vessel. If no changes are seen over the course of 4 weeks, contact the
surgeon for follow-up. Ideally, it is best if the same person evaluates
the access for the first month.
Using
your fingertips, palpate the entire length of the fistula. Not only
should the vessel increase in size, it needs to thicken in order to
withstand repeated needle punctures, increased pressure created by the
arterial blood flow and eventually by the blood pump. Take a minute and
feel the vein in your wrist and see how soft and pliable an immature
“fistula” is. A clinical sign that a patient’s fistula wall is
thickening is when you compress and release the fistula and the vein
wall rebounds under your fingers with a springy, firm feel.
Auscultating
the access should be done in conjunction with palpation. To verify
patency, the whooshing sound of the bruit should be continuous, but you
also want to listen for the quality or strength of the bruit, as this
can indicate adequate flow through the access. Listening for pitch
changes of the bruit can be helpful in determining if there is a
problem like a juxta-anastomotic (inflow) or arterial stenosis that
could decrease inflow and not providing for enough resistance in the
vein for development of the fistula. When stenosis is present, the
usually low pitch will change to a higher pitch at the site of the
stenosis.
While
this clinical consult has reviewed ways to determine AV fistula
maturity, a general nursing assessment also needs to be completed and
documented, including a description of the surgical dressing, any
swelling, and an overall skin assessment of the arm. General vascular
access assessment can be found in the Nephrology Nursing Standards of
Practice and Guidelines for Care (Burrows-Hudson & Prowant, 2005).
The
trend will continue to be the creation of more AV fistulae. The
challenge will be to see more AV fistulae that are functional. Nurses
will play a key role in making that happen.
References ABeathard, G.A. (1998). Physical examination of the dialysis vascular access. Seminars in Dialysis, 11, 231-236.
Beathard, G.A., Arnold, P., Jackson, J., Litchfield, T., &
Physician Operators Forum of RMS Lifeline. (2003). Aggressive treatment
of early fistula failure. Kidney International, 60(4), 1487.
Burrows-Hudson, S., & Prowant, B.F. (Eds.). (2005). Nephrology
nursing standards of practice and guidelines for care (p. 63). Pitman,
NJ: American Nephrology Nurses’ Association.
Robbin, M.L., Chamberlain, N.E., Lockhart, M.E., Gallichio, M.H.,
Young, C.J., Deierhoi, M.H., et al. (2003). Hemodialysis arteriovenous
fistula maturity: U.S. evaluation. Radiology, 227(3), 906-907.
Wong, V., Ward, R., Taylor, J., Selvakumar, S., How, T.V., &
Bakran, A. (1996). Factors associated with early failure of
arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis access. European Journal of
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 12, 207-213.
| The
Clinical Consult department is designed to provide answers to questions
concerning clinical problems and to report innovative clinical
practices. Readers are invited to submit questions to be answered by a
guest consultant. Questions should provide background information and
state specific information requested. Answers will be referenced.
Manuscripts that address clinical problems or present innovative ideas
are also invited. These should be between 400 and 600 words and contain
one to three references. Address correspondence to: Charlotte Szromba,
Clinical Consult Department Editor, through the ANNA National Office;
East Holly Avenue/Box 56; Pitman NJ 08071-0056; (856) 256-2320. You may
also log onto this column at www.nephrologynursingjournal.net (click on
Department link) and email your comments to the Department Editor (see
Discussion Area). The opinions and assertions contained herein are the
private views of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the American Nephrology Nurses’ Association. |
|