|
Weight Management in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis
Sharon Stall
| The Issues in Renal Nutrition
in Nephrology Nursing department is designed to focus on nutritional
issues for nephrology patients. Address correspondence to: Deborah Brommage,
Department Editor, Nephrology Nursing Journal; East Holly Avenue/Box
56; Pitman NJ 08071-0056; (856) 256-2320. The opinions and assertions
contained herein are the private views of the contributors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the American Nephrology Nurses'
Association. |
Obesity
is epidemic in the United States and is associated with increased risk
of morbidity and mortality in the general population (Stein &
Colditz, 2004). In patients on hemodialysis (HD), there is a reverse
epidemiology – that is, patients who are obese seem to have a survival
advantage (Kalantar-Zadeh et al., 2005). Most, but not all, studies
show this survival benefit does not exist for patients on peritoneal
dialysis (PD) (Kalantar-Zadeh et al., 2005; Ikizler, 2005). Although
this research places obesity in the dialysis population in a new light,
it seems that for the individual patient on PD, obesity may still be
considered a health risk that needs to be managed.
The
primary cause of weight gain in the patient on PD is the use of
dextrose-based solutions for dialysis (Jolly et al., 2001). Unwanted
weight gain is a consequence of PD therapy in some patients. This
article discusses weight management strategies for persons on PD.
The Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription
In
peritoneal dialysis, a hyperosmolar glucose solution is infused into
the peritoneal cavity and the peritoneal membrane acts as a dialyzer.
Dialysis occurs by diffusion, absorption, and ultrafiltration (UF).
These transport mechanisms are helpful in understanding issues with
weight gain in the PD population. The amount of calories absorbed in a
given dialysis patient will depend upon the glucose concentration used,
the dialysate dwell volume, the dwell time, and the membrane
characteristics of the patient (see Table 1).
Dextrose
is a relatively safe and inexpensive osmotic agent, and as stated
earlier it is also a source of calories. Dialysis solutions are
available as 1.5%, 2.5% and 4.25% dextrose. In any given patient, the
amount of ultrafiltration, that is water removed, may be improved by
increasing the tonicity of the solution. A 4.25% solution has a higher
osmolarity and is more effective at fluid removal than a 1.5% solution
(Sorkin & Blake, 2001). This basic tenet of PD – the greater the
glucose load, the greater the UF – is a useful tool in the clinical
setting for treating volume overload. However, avoiding the use of
hypertonic solutions and preventing situations that require the maximal
ultrafiltration effect of hypertonic solutions, is one step in limiting
unwanted weight gain in the PD patient (Blake & Diaz-Buxo, 2001).
In addition, exposing the peritoneal membrane to high glucose loads
over time may damage the membrane and is best to be avoided (Davies,
Phillips, Naish, & Russell, 2001).
Icodextran
is an alternative to dextrose containing solutions. It uses polyglucose
as the osmotic agent, is effective at ultrafiltration, and is
particularly useful for the long dwell, where there is the greatest
likelihood of glucose absorption. It is a proprietary formula and it is
expensive (Blake & Daugirdas, 2001; McCann, 2004). There are
important issues in blood sugar monitoring for persons with diabetes
who use icodextran (Blake & Diaz-Buxo, 2001).
Peritoneal
dialysis fluid is infused into the peritoneal cavity. These fill
volumes are typically 2.0-2.5 L, but may be as high 3.0 L, as tolerated
by the patient. Larger volumes are increasingly used because they
optimize clearance and help achieve adequacy targets. It follows, the
larger the volumes, the greater the calories absorbed.
The membrane characteristics of the patients may be determined by the
peritoneal equilibration test (PET). A more thorough discussion of this
is elsewhere. (Blake & Daugirdas, 2001). High transporters are at
greatest risk for weight gain from the infused dextrose solutions
because they absorb the glucose and lose the osmotic gradient for
effective ultrafiltration (Oreopoulos & Rao, 2001).
There
is less dextrose absorption in automated peritoneal dialysis with
shorter dwell times than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with
longer dwell times. Hybrid dialysis prescriptions combining short and
long dwells are becoming commonplace.
Patient Assessment: From PD Prescription to Nutrition
The
nutrition component of a weight management program for patients on PD
includes targeting a realistic weight, establishing a calorie level to
maintain weight, determining calories absorbed from the dialysate, and
reviewing diet and physical activity.
Weight
(minus dwell volume) is compared to the Standard Body Weight (SBW) as
outlined by the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition in
Chronic Renal Failure (National Kidney Foundation [NKF], 2000). This
SBW is then used to calculate energy requirements. Recommendations for
calorie intake are 35 kcal/kg/ SBW/day for persons younger than 60
years of age and 30 to 35 kcal/kg SBW/day for persons 60 years of age
or older (NKF, 2000). This calorie level is thought to maintain optimal
nutritional status in maintenance dialysis patients. Adjusted body
weight may be used to standardize weight for nutrient calculations
(NKF, 2000).
The
calories from dialysate are considered as part of the energy intake.
Approximately 45%-60% of glucose may be absorbed from dialysis. This
may account for 10%-30% of daily calories (Blake & Diaz-Buxo, 2001;
Ikizler, 2005; Kalantar-Zadeh et al., 2005). The actual calories
absorbed may be measured by subtracting the grams of glucose in the
effluent from the grams of glucose that were infused (Blake &
Diaz-Buxo, 2001). Formulas that estimate absorption are routinely used
in practice to calculate the energy input form the PD prescription
(McCann, 2004).
Health
care practitioners need to be familiar with body mass index (BMI,)
defined as the weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared
to classify overweight and obesity. This index of fatness has become a
standard to describe obesity and health risk (Hill, Catenacci, &
Wyatt, 2006) (see Table 2). Nomograms and tables for BMI exist for ease
of use (National Institute of Health [NIH], 2000). Weight may be
compared to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) II SBW, other reference tables, the patient’s own weight
history and classified by BMI; however, a realistic weight for the
patient is determined by the clinical judgment of the team (McCann,
2004). The goal for patients who are overweight and obese is to prevent
weight gain and to keep body weight stable (Bray, 2006).

The
nutritionist uses various tools of dietary assessment such as a 24-hour
food recall and food frequency to determine the patient’s food
preferences and eating pattern (NKF, 2000). Diet recommendations are
given, not losing sight that malnutrition is a cause of morbidity and
mortality in the patient on dialysis, and that patients on PD often
experience low albumin. The diet plan must encompass the protein needs
of the patient, the nutritional status, and other diet restriction as
indicated.
Salt
intake should be kept at 2-3 gm/day in most patients despite excellent
sodium clearances (McCann, 2004). An increased salt load may lead to
volume overload, which may cause the need for ultrafiltration and the
use of high concentrated glucose solutions. The importance of sodium
modification in the diet cannot be overstated.
It
is important to remember that overweight patients are not immune from
the lure of diet gimmicks and quick weight loss plans. It is imperative
that the nurse and RD work together as a team to make sure the patient
understands the causes of weight gain and the importance of a healthy
eating plan. In addition, long-term benefits of weight reduction have
not been adequately studied in the CKD population (NKF, 2003).
The
benefits of physical activity, one of which is an increase in energy
expenditure, may be extrapolated from the general population, though
few studies exist in patients with CKD (NKF, 2003). Patients who are on
dialysis often have physical limitations that affect mobility. In
addition, fatigue may contribute to inactivity. The dialysis team may
try to accommodate more active patients by adjusting the volume of the
infused dialysate or allowing a patient to go “dry” to participate in
strenuous exercise such as running or jogging. This adjustment needs to
be considered in the overall dialysis prescription while maintaining
adequacy standards. The goal is to increase energy expenditure while
accommodating the ability of the patient and the constraints of PD.
Hollis, Corden, and Williams (2005) describe a 1-year program in which
they were able to demonstrate weight reduction in 7 out of 8 patients
on PD. The study used dietary intervention, exercise, and manipulation
of dialysis prescription (including use of alternative osmotic agent
dialysate) to reduce glucose-based dialysis exposure. This work shows
that with a team approach the patient on PD may achieve weight loss,
although the long-term benefits of this weight loss were not studied.
In addition, weight management programs with weight maintenance as the
goal are similar to weight reduction in that physical activity,
manipulation of dialysis, and reduced calorie intake (allowing for the
calories from peritoneal dialysis) are the cornerstones of treatment.
Summary
In
summary, patients on PD, along with their health care providers, can be
taught tools to manage weight. These techniques include, but are not
limited to, judicious use of dialysis solution to provide adequate
dialysis and ultrafiltration with the least exposure to glucose,
careful attention to diet including salt and calories consumed, and
physical activity.
References
Blake,
P.G., & Daugirdas, J.T. (2001). Physiology of peritoneal dialysis.
In J.T. Daugirdas, P.G. Blake, & T.S. Ing (Eds.), Handbook of
dialysis (3rd ed., pp.281-296). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams
& Wilkins.
Blake, P.G., & Diaz-Buxo, J.A.(2001).
Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis and chronic peritoneal dialysis
prescription. In J.T. Daugirdas, P.G. Blake, & T.S. Ing (Eds.),
Handbook of dialysis (3rd ed., pp.343-360). Philadelphia: Lippincott,
Williams & Wilkins.
Bray, G.A. (2006). Diet and the initiation of therapy for obesity. Retrieved June 22, 2006, from www.uptodate.com
Davies, S.J., Phillips, L., Naish, P.F.,
& Russell, G.I. (2001). Peritoneal glucose exposure and changes in
membrane solute transport with time on peritoneal dialysis. Journal of
the American Society of Nephrology, 12(5), 1046-1051.
Hill, J.O., Catenacci, V.A., & Wyatt,
H.R. (2006). Obesity: Etiology. In M.E. Shils, M. Shike, A.C. Ross, B.
Caballero, R.J. & Cousins (Eds.), Modern nutrition in health and
disease (10th ed., pp. 1013-1028). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams
& Wilkins.
Hollis, J., Corden, E., & Williams,
P.F. (2005). Longitudinal evaluation of a weight reduction program for
patients on peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International,
25(Suppl 3), S152-S154.
Ikizler, T.A. (2005). Nutrition and
peritoneal dialysis. In W.E. Mitch, & S. Klahr (Eds.), Handbook of
nutrition and the kidney (pp. 228-244). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott,
Williams & Wilkins.
Jolly, S., Chatatalsingh, C., Bargman, J.,
Vas, S., Chu, M., & Oreopoulos, D.G. (2001). Excessive weight gain
during peritoneal dialysis. International Journal of Artificial Organs,
24, 197-202.
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Abbott, K.C.,
Salahudeen, A.K., Kilpatrick, R.D., & Horwich, T.B. (2005).
Survival advantages of obesity in dialysis patients. American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition, 81(3), 543-554.
McCann, L. (2004). Nutrition management of
the adult peritoneal dialysis patient. In L. Byham-Gray, & K.
Wiesen (Eds.), A clinical guide to nutrition care in kidney disease
(pp. 57-69). Chicago: American Dietetic Association.
National Kidney Foundation (NKF). (2000).
K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal
failure. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 35(Suppl 2), S36.
National Kidney Foundation (NKF). (2003).
K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in
chronic kidney disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 41(Suppl
3), S1-S92.
National Institute of Health (NIH). (2000).
The practical guide. Identification, evaluation, and treatment of
overweight and obesity in adults. NIH Publication Number 00-4028.
Washington, DC: Author.
Oreopoulos, D.G, & Rao, P.S. (2001).
Assessing peritoneal ultrafiltration, solute transport, and volume
status. In J.T. Daugirdas, P.G. Blake, & T.S. Ing (Eds.), Handbook
of dialysis (3rd ed., pp.361-372). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams
& Wilkins.
Stein, C., & Colditz, G.A. (2004). The
epidemic of obesity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &
Metabolism, 89(6), 2522-2525.
Sorkin, M.I., & Blake, P.G. (2001).
Apparatus for peritoneal dialysis. In J.T. Daugirdas, P.G. Blake, &
T.S. Ing (Eds.), Handbook of dialysis (3rd ed., pp.297-308).
Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
|